Opinion

Conner v. Levering

  • 6 F. Cas. 308
  • 2 Cranch 163
Court
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Filed
Apr 15, 1819
Status
Published
On the bench
Cranch, Gave, Point, Upon
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

THE COURT

instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the bale of goods was delivered to the plaintiff, or put on board of the vessel, and was lost by the negligence or fraud of the p'ain-tiff, he could not recover in this suit; the value of the goods being more than the amount of his wages.

THE COURT refused to instruct the jury that the plaintiff was liable for a mere mistake in returning to the master a bale more than was actually received. See Crammer v. The Fair American [Case No. 3,317]; and Lewis v. Davis. 3 Johns. IS.

CRANCH, Chief Judge, gave no opinion upon the last point.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.