Opinion

United States v. Brown

  • 258 F. App'x 347
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Dec 7, 2007
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Ginsburg, Rogers
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.1%

The opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was briefed by the parties. It is

Ordered and Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed. Although Brown complains that the district court considered imposing a higher sentence on remand, the district court did not actually impose a higher sentence. Furthermore, Brown failed to rebut the presumption that the district court’s within-Guidelines sentence was reasonable. United States v. Dorcely, 454 F.3d 366, 376 (D.C.Cir.2006).

*348 Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for hearing en banc. See Fed. R.App P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.