Opinion

Brown v. Mathena

393 F. App'x 987

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: Sep 3, 2010
Status: Published
On the bench: Duncan, Hamilton, King
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 47.4%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clayton Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Mathena, No. 7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu, 2010 WL 1965105 (WJD.Va. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *988 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.