Opinion

Hilley v. Mabus

  • 387 F. App'x 365
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jul 6, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Duncan, Motz, Niemeyer
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.3%

The opinion

*366 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lance M. Hilley appeals the district court’s judgment denying Hilley’s summary judgment motion and granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment on Hilley’s “mixed case” seeking review of a Merit Systems Protection Board decision, and disability discrimination claims under the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 2005 & Supp.2010), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-7961 (West 2008 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Hilley v. Mabus, No. 2:08-ev-00457-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.