Opinion

United States v. Brown

385 F. App'x 320

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: Jun 25, 2010
Status: Published
On the bench: King, Shedd, Wilkinson
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby James Brown appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 1:00-cr-00100-AMD-1 (D. Md. April 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.