Opinion

Amr v. Virginia State University

  • 352 F. App'x 845
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Nov 16, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Hamilton, King, Shedd
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.8%

The opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to supplement the record for the appeal to this court of his underlying civil case. Because our decision in that appeal has issued, Amr v. Virginia State Univ., 331 Fed.Appx. 194 (4th Cir.2009) (unpublished), this appeal is now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth the principles of appellate mootness). Therefore, we dismiss Amr’s appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.