Opinion

Farley v. Brown

334 F. App'x 565

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: Oct 23, 2009
Status: Published
On the bench: Hamilton, Niemeyer, Traxler
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David P. Farley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed in a closed case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farley v. Brown, No. 5:06-cv-00209-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.