Opinion

Richardson v. Virginia Department of Corrections

  • 332 F. App'x 930
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Oct 5, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Michael, Motz, Niemeyer
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.6%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court’s order imposing a pre-filing injunction because of his frequent and frivolous legal actions. See Richardson v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-00514-REP (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2009). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s order. See In re Burnley, 988 F.2d 1, 3-4 (4th Cir.1992) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm and deny as moot Richardson’s motion for bail or release pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.