Opinion

Holloman v. Brown

  • 332 F. App'x 887
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Sep 24, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Gregory, Michael, Shedd
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lennell Holloman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Holloman v. Brown, No. 2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2009; entered Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *888 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.