Opinion

United States v. Ford

  • 318 F. App'x 205
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 18, 2009
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.5%

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Ford, Norman Brown, Paul Win-estock, Jr., Michael Smith, Jeffrey Reid, and Walter Smith appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated by the court. United States v. Brown, No. 1:90-cr-00454-WMN (D.Md. Oct. 6, 2008). We also deny appellant Winestock’s motions for appointment of counsel and for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.