Opinion

Deen v. Holder

  • 554 F. App'x 169
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 7, 2014
Status
Published
On the bench
Agee, Motz, Thacker
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.5%

The opinion

*170 Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mabinty Marray Deen, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s order finding that she was not eligible for adjustment of status. Deen claims that she was denied due process because the Attorney General misinformed the immigration judge. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that Deen fails to show that the outcome of the case was prejudiced in any way by the Attorney General’s representation. See Anim v. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir.2008).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.