Opinion

Richards v. Brown

  • 544 F. App'x 230
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Oct 25, 2013
Status
Published
On the bench
Niemeyer, Thacker, Wilkinson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark E. Richards appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as frivolous his complaint and denying his motion submitted under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richards v. Brown, No. 3:11-cv-00426-REP, 2012 WL 4321446 (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2012; June 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.