Opinion

Crepeau v. Chao

  • 311 F. App'x 648
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 23, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Agee, Duncan, Wilkinson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Crepeau appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her religious discrimination and sexual harassment claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and her claim challenging the Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision upholding her fifteen-day employment suspension. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Crepeau v. Chao, No. 1:06-ev-01308-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 13, 2007; entered Nov. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.