Opinion

Kemph v. Brown

  • 522 F. App'x 203
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 5, 2013
Status
Published
On the bench
Diaz, Shedd, Thacker
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.4%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Timothy Kemph appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice as legally frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, * see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(l), 1367(c) (2006), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kemph v. Brown, No. 7:12-cv-00430-GEC (W.D.Va. Nov. 8, 2012; Jan. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the *204 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by the district court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.