Opinion

Wilson v. Johnson

  • 164 F. App'x 425
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 2, 2006
Status
Published
On the bench
Gregory, Luttig, Williams
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.3%

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying his action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), challenging the decisions and procedures of the Virginia Parole Board. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilson v. Johnson, No. CA-05-842-1-GBL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We reject Wilson’s contention that the Su *426 preme Court’s decision in Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74 , 125 S.Ct. 1242 , 161 L.Ed.2d 253 (2005), renders the district court’s decision incorrect. We deny Wilson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis as unnecessary in view of his PLRA status. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.