Opinion

Chestnut v. Brown

444 F. App'x 677

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: Aug 30, 2011
Status: Published
On the bench: Duncan, Keenan, Motz
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we af *678 firm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chestnut v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-01784-RMG, 2011 WL 1543301 (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.