Opinion

Richardson v. Gray

433 F. App'x 176

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: Jun 2, 2011
Status: Published
On the bench: Davis, Keenan, Niemeyer
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 66.1%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mike Anthony Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Captain Gray, No. 4:08-cv-03539-RBH, 2010 WL 4809429 (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2010). We deny Richardson’s motions to appoint counsel and for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.