Opinion

Kelly v. West Virginia Board of Law Examiners

  • 418 F. App'x 203
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 18, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Hamilton, Shedd, Wilkinson
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.1%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shannon Kelly appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of the Respondents in his complaint alleging Americans with Disabilities Act, due process, and equal protection violations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. West Virginia Bd. of Law Exam’rs., No. 2:08-cv-00933-DAF (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 31 & Apr. 16, 2010). We deny the Appellees’ motion to strike the Appellant’s informal reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.