Opinion

Akers v. Highlands Community Services Board

  • 418 F. App'x 171
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 18, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Agee, King, Motz
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

April Edwina Sparks Akers appeals the district court’s judgment granting Defen *172 dant’s summary judgment motion on her sexual harassment, sex discrimination, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.SU.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Akers v. Highlands Cmty. Sens. Bd., No. 1:08-cv-00039-jpj-pms, 2010 WL 234763 (W.D.Va. Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.