Opinion

Burgess v. Brown

  • 127 F. App'x 366
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Apr 13, 2005
Status
Published
On the bench
Fletcher, Paez, Trott
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.1%

The opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Reginald P. Burgess appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision denying his request to intervene in his former attorney’s appeal from a bankruptcy court’s denial of sanctions. We lack jurisdiction over Burgess’ appeal because the BAP’s order denying Burgess’ request to intervene constituted a final judgment and he did not file his notice of appeal within 30 days of that order. See United States v. City of Oakland, 958 F.2d 300, 301-02 (9th Cir.1992); see also Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (indicating that a civil appeal must be filed within 30 days after final judgment).

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.