Opinion

Muldrow v. Eagleton

  • 83 F. App'x 542
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Dec 22, 2003
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.0%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Edward Leon Muldrow appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated by the district court. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in *543 denying the Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. Brown v. French, 147 F.3d 307, 310 (4th Cir.1998). See Muldrow v. Eagleton, No. CA-02-3294-22BC-3 (D.S.C. May 30, 2003; July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.