Opinion

Perry v. Brown

  • 639 F.3d 1153
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7311
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Mar 23, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Hawkins, Reinhardt, Smith
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 54.5%

The opinion

*1154 ORDER

Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756 , 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir.2006), we deny Plaintiffs’ motion at this time.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.