Opinion

State ex rel. Green v. Brown

  • 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 155
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 29, 1964
Status
Published
On the bench
Gibson, Grieeith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taet, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action in mandamus originating in this court to compel respondent, Secretary of State, to file certain articles of incorporation which he has refused to file.

The case is now before this court on respondent’s demurrer to the petition.

We do not deem it necessary to set forth the purpose clause of relator’s proposed articles of incorporation. Some of the purposes set forth in that purpose clause describe activities which would amount to the practice of law. Relator admitted this in argument before this court. It follows that the demurrer must be sustained and the writ denied. See State, ex rel. Green, v. Brown, Secy. of State, 173 Ohio St., 114 .

Writ denied.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Grieeith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.