Opinion

State ex rel. Schwartz v. Brown

  • 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 91
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 9, 1964
Status
Published
On the bench
Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Our statutes (1) provide that the Secretary of State “shall * * * certify to each board” of elections on the 75th day before the primary election (here February 20) the names of the state candidates to be printed on the ballots (Section 3513.05, Revised Code) and (2) contemplate that armed-service and absentee ballots for this primary should have been available by March 6, 1964 (Sections 3511.03 and 3509.03, Revised Code). Under the circumstances here, where time is such an important factor, extreme diligence and the promptest of action were required on the part of relator. The unexplained *92 lack of diligence on the part of relator deprives him. of the relief he seeks. State, ex rel. Winterfeld, v. Board of Elections of Lucas County, 167 Ohio St., 531 ; State, ex rel. Peirce, v. Board of Elections of Stark County, 168 Ohio St., 249 .

The case is dismissed sua sponte.

Case dismissed.

Taft, 0. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.