Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Harshman

  • 101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 529
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 22, 1920
Status
Published
On the bench
Johnson, Jones, Matthias, Merrell, Nichols, Robinson, Wanamaker
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

The court find that no final order has been made or entered by the court of appeals from which the plaintiff in error can prosecute this proceeding in error. The cause was heard in the court of appeals upon an information or complaint in con *530 tempt against the board of county commissioners for failure and refusal to comply with a former decree of said court of appeals which was rendered March 23, 1918, as a result whereof the court of appeals modified and reaffirmed such former order and decree and required that it be complied with by the date therein designated. If this proceeding in error is from the order and decree of March 23, 1918, it comes too late; if it is from the order and decree of December 17, 1919, it is premature, for as yet there has been no judgment of contempt by that court for refusal of the commissioners to obey and execute the. order and decree previously made and entered by the court of appeals. It is therefore ordered that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

Petition in error dismissed.

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.