Opinion

Davis v. Van Zandt

2 D.C. 208

Court: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Filed: Jun 15, 1820
Status: Published
Cited by: 0 cases
Authority: More cited than 8.4%

The opinion

But

the CouRT

{nan. con.) said it was not necessary to prove that fact to take the note out of the statute of limitations. The action.is brought on the note, and not on the new promise.

(But see Wetzel v. Bussard, 11 Wheat. 309 ; Read v. Wilkin son, 2 Wash. C. C. Rep. 514 ; Lonsdale v. Brown, 3 Wash. C. C. Rep. 404 .)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.