Opinion

State v. State Board of Assessors

  • 56 N.J.L. 717
  • 27 Vroom 717
  • 32 A. 2
  • 1894 N.J. LEXIS 28
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Mar 15, 1894
Status
Published
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.1%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Abbett, Depue, Dixon, Lippincott, Reed, Bogert, Brown, Phelps, Smith. 10.

For reversal—None.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.