Opinion

Brown v. Simandl

93 N.J. Eq. 225
115 A. 925
1921 N.J. LEXIS 285

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed: Sep 30, 1921
Status: Published
On the bench: Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Black, Bus, Gardner, Heppeni, Ieimer, Kalisot, Katzenbach, Kirk, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Williams
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisot-i, Black, Katzenbach, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Bus-kirk — 1-1.

For reversal — None.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.