Opinion

Johnson v. Principi

  • 15 Vet. App. 252
  • 2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1188
  • 2001 WL 1301463
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Oct 26, 2001
Status
Published
On the bench
Farley, Holdaway, Per Curiam, Steinberg
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 46.0%

The opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO . 99-1547

MARCELLA C. JOHNSON , APPELLANT ,

V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before FARLEY, HOLDAWAY, and STEINBERG, Judges.

ORDER

The appellant, Marcella C. Johnson, appeals, through counsel, a May 1999 decision of the

Board of Veterans' Appeal (Board) which determined that the veteran's son, Robert W. Johnson, Jr.,

may not be recognized as a helpless child.

On November 9, 2000, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), Pub. L. No.

106-475, 114 Stat. 2096 (2000), was enacted. On April 10, 2001, the Secretary, pursuant to an order

by the Court to show cause, filed a motion for remand in light of the enactment of the VCAA.

Pursuant to section 7(a)(2) of the VCAA, the amendment to section 5107 is applicable to "any claim

. . . filed before the date of the enactment of [the VCAA] and not final as of that date." See Holliday

v. Principi, 14 Vet.App. 280 (2001) (holding all sections of VCAA are retroactive). In Karnas v.

Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 308, 312-13 (1991), this Court held that where a statute or regulation changes

during the appellate process, the version most favorable to the claimant will apply. Moreover, it is

not the function of this Court to determine in the first instance which version of the law is most

favorable to the claimant. See Baker v. West, 11 Vet.App. 163 (1998); Dudnick v. Brown, 10

Vet.App. 79 (1997). Accordingly, a remand is required in order to provide the Board with an

opportunity to readjudicate the appellant's claim.

On remand, the appellant is free to submit additional evidence and arguments necessary for

the resolution of his claim. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet.App. 369, 372 (1999). The Board shall

proceed expeditiously. See Veterans Benefits Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 302, 108

Stat. 4645, 4658 (1994) (found at 38 U.S.C. § 5101 note) (requiring Secretary to provide for

"expeditious treatment" of claim remanded by Board or Court); Drosky v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 251,

257 (1997).

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Secretary's motion is granted, the Board's May 1999 decision is

VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for further adjudication.

DATED: October 26, 2001 PER CURIAM.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.