Opinion

Patek v. Gober

  • 14 Vet. App. 233
  • 2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 6
  • 2001 WL 25814
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Jan 10, 2001
Status
Published
On the bench
Holdaway, Ivers, Per Curiam, Steinberg
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO . 99-775

JANE A. PATEK, APPELLANT ,

V.

HERSHEL W. GOBER,

ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before HOLDAWAY, IVERS, and STEINBERG, Judges.

ORDER

On October 18, 2000, the Court in a single-judge memorandum decision affirmed an April

5, 1999, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals that determined that new and material evidence

had not been submitted to reopen a claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.

On November 18, 2000, the appellant, through counsel, filed a motion for a decision by a panel.

On November 9, 2000, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-475,

114 Stat. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000) [hereinafter VCAA], was enacted. Section 5103(a) as amended by the

VCAA provides:

Upon receipt of a complete or substantially complete application, the Secretary shall

notify the claimant and the claimant's representative, if any, of any information, and

any medical or lay evidence, not previously provided to the Secretary that is

necessary to substantiate the claim. As part of that notice, the Secretary shall indicate

which portion of that information and evidence, if any, is to be provided by the

claimant and which portion, in any, the Secretary, in accordance with section 5103A

of this title and any other applicable provision of law, will attempt to obtain on behalf

of the claimant.

In Karnas v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 308, 312-13 (1991), this Court held that unless Congress

provided otherwise, where a statute or regulation changes during the appellate process, the version

most favorable to the claimant shall apply. It is not the function of this Court to determine in the first

instance which version of the law is most favorable to the claimant. See Baker v. West, 11 Vet.App.

163 (1998); Dudnick v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 79 (1997).

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant shall, within 30 days after the date of this order, file, and serve

on the Secretary, a supplemental memorandum of law explaining what impact, if any, she believes

that the enactment of the VCAA has on the disposition of her underlying appeal and the motion for

panel decision. Also, the appellant shall explain why the Board decision should not be vacated and

this matter remanded pursuant to the VCAA and Karnas, supra. The Secretary shall file, and serve

on the appellant, a reply to the appellant's supplemental memorandum 30 days after its date of

service. The appellant may, if she chooses, file a reply to the Secretary's response within 14 days

after the date of service of the Secretary's response.

DATED: January 10, 2001 PER CURIAM.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.