Frix

Opinion

Orwitz v. Board of Dental Examiners

  • 313 U.S. 546
  • 61 S. Ct. 1088
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
May 12, 1941
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.0%

The opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Semler v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608 ; Brown v. Massachusetts, 308 U. S. 504 . (2) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53 ; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344 ; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.