Opinion

Martinez v. Brown

  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3800
  • 135 S. Ct. 1855
  • 191 L. Ed. 2d 735
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2628
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Apr 20, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 44.3%

pro se “Plaintiffs bald assertions that there was a conspiracy between state actors and Verizon N.Y. and T-Mobile to illegally wiretap him, without more, are insufficient to plausibly allege that these private defendants were acting under the color of state law.”

How later courts described this case

  • pro se “Plaintiffs bald assertions that there was a conspiracy between state actors and Verizon N.Y. and T-Mobile to illegally wiretap him, without more, are insufficient to plausibly allege that these private defendants were acting under the color of state law.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.