Opinion

State v. Loudermill

  • 31 Ohio Law Rep. 9
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 7, 1965
Status
Published
Author
Schneider
On the bench
Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Schneider, Judge.

Where the evidence in a criminal case would support a finding by the jury of guilt of a lesser offense included in the offense for which defendant was indicted and tried, the refusal of the trial court to charge upon that lesser included offense is error prejudicial to the rights of defendant. (Paragraph two of the syllabus of State v. Patterson, 172 OhioSt. 319, 16 O.O.(2d) 116, overruled; Freeman v. State, 119 OhioSt. 250, and State v. Muskus, 158 OhioSt. 276, 49 O.O. 122 , approved and followed.)

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.

Zimmerman, Matthias and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.