Opinion

Electrolux Corp. v. United States

  • 21 Cust. Ct. 174
  • 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 529
Court
United States Customs Court
Filed
Jun 30, 1948
Status
Published
Author
Ekwall
On the bench
Ekwall
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the testimony produced at the trial, together with an examination of the official papers in evidence, it was apparent that the disputed items were never received and apparently were not shipped. The plaintiff having sustained its burden of proof on the issue of nonimportation, the protest was sustained as to the items in question. (United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351, and United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board, id. 118, C. A. D. 352, followed.)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.