Opinion

Cowsert v. Schooler

  • 258 Mo. 96
  • 167 S.W. 447
  • 1914 Mo. LEXIS 319
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
May 20, 1914
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Baris, Bond, Brown, Graves, Lamm, Pee, Walker, Woodson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

BROWN, C.

— This case was tried in the circuit court with the case of Luther S. Schooler et al. v. William N. Schooler et al., decided by us at this term. [Ante, p. 83.] One trial was made to answer for both cases. The facts, which are the same in each, were fairly and fully stated by Bond, J., in that case, and I can do no better than to express my approval of the result reached by him. I find it unnecessary, however, to consider the views expressed by him in the last paragraph of the opinion, for the reason that the failure of Mrs. Cowsert to offer herself as a witness has not influenced me in my conclusion.

The judgment is affirmed.

PEE CURIAM. —

This case coming from Division Two into Banc on a dissent on rehearing, the foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

Graves, Brown, Bond and Baris, JJ., concur; Lamm, G. J., Woodson and Walker, JJ., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.