Opinion

Hackney v. American Prescription Providers of Georgia, Inc.

  • 258 Ga. App. 130
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 3186
  • 572 S.E.2d 765
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 1372
Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Filed
Oct 22, 2002
Status
Published
Author
Barnes
On the bench
Barnes
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.1%

dismissing as moot an appeal from the denial of motion to compel discovery from nonparty, due to Superior Court’s decision. See generally Brown v. Brewer, 237 Ga. App. 145, 147- 148 (3) (513 SE2d 10) (1999

How later courts described this case

  • dismissing as moot an appeal from the denial of motion to compel discovery from nonparty, due to Superior Court’s decision. See generally Brown v. Brewer, 237 Ga. App. 145, 147- 148 (3) (513 SE2d 10) (1999
  • appeal from denial of motion to compel discovery moot due to unappealed grant of summary judgment to party who purportedly did not comply with discovery

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Barnes, Judge.

Edmund F. Hackney appeals the denial of his motion to compel answers to request for production of documents from an out-of-state entity which is not a party to the litigation. For the reasons that follow, we must dismiss the appeal.

Our first consideration is whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Atlantic-Canadian Corp. v. Hammer, Siler &c. Assoc., 167 Ga. App. 257 (1) ( 306 SE2d 22 ) (1983). The discovery Hackney sought in this motion to compel was allegedly relevant only to his third-party complaint against American Prescription Providers of Georgia, Inc.

After the motion to compel was denied, however, the trial court granted summary judgment to American Prescription Providers on Hackney’s third-party claim, and Hackney has not appealed the grant of summary judgment. Therefore, any issue concerning the discovery dispute is moot.

Under the Appellate Practice Act, the dismissal of an appeal is mandatory for the three specific instances contained in subsection (b) of OCGA § 5-6-48, one of which is “(3) Where the questions presented have become moot.” A moot case is one which seeks to determine an abstract question which does not arise upon existing facts or rights. Gober v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 228 Ga. 668, 670 ( 187 SE2d 275 ) (1972), held: “This court will upon its own motion dismiss an appeal where it affirmatively appears that a decision would be of no benefit to the complaining party.”

(Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Chastain v. Baker, 255 Ga. 432, 433 ( 339 SE2d 241 ) (1986).

Appeal dismissed.

Ruffin, P. J., and Pope, Senior Appellate Judge, concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.