Opinion

District Board of Trustees v. Morgan

  • 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 164
  • 918 So. 2d 273
  • 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2551
  • 2005 WL 3429760
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Dec 15, 2005
Status
Published
On the bench
Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.0%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review District Board of Trustees v. Morgan, 890 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), a decision by the Fifth District Court of Appeal certifying conflict with the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in O’Kon & Co. v. Riedel, 588 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that Morgan and O’Kon & Co. are factually distinct so that the decisions are not in conflict and may live side-by-side in the law of Florida. We therefore exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.