Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 776 So. 2d 216
  • 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 228
  • 2000 WL 869558
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Jun 30, 2000
Status
Published
Author
Long
On the bench
Long, McMillan, Cobb, Baschab, Fry
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 46.0%

holding that the defendant was allowed to withdraw plea where the defendant entered into a plea agreement with the State in which the State agreed to recommend a sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment but the trial court rejected the recommended sentence and sentenced the defendant to 25 years’ imprisonment, even though the defendant was advised and understood before he entered his plea that the trial court was not bound by the recommendation of the State

How later courts described this case

  • holding that the defendant was allowed to withdraw plea where the defendant entered into a plea agreement with the State in which the State agreed to recommend a sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment but the trial court rejected the recommended sentence and sentenced the defendant to 25 years’ imprisonment, even though the defendant was advised and understood before he entered his plea that the trial court was not bound by the recommendation of the State

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LONG, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, John Henry Brown pleaded guilty to robbery in *217 the third degree, a violation of § 13A-8-43, Ala.Code 1975. The trial court sentenced Brown, as a habitual offender, to 25 years in prison.

On appeal, Brown contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He argues that the trial court rejected the plea agreement he had reached with the State and then failed to allow him to withdraw his plea.

Brown was indicted for first-degree robbery, see § 13A-8-41, Ala.Code 1975. Subsequently, Brown entered a guilty plea to robbery in the third degree, based on a written negotiated plea agreement, pursuant to which the State agreed to recommend that Brown be sentenced, as a habitual offender, to 15 years in prison. At the guilty plea hearing, the trial court advised Brown that it was not bound by the terms of the plea agreement. After accepting Brown’s guilty plea, the trial court continued the case for presentence investigation. At Brown’s sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Brown, as a habitual offender, to 25 years in prison. Brown moved to withdraw his guilty plea on grounds that his plea was based on the State’s agreement to recommend a 15-year sentence and that if the trial court failed to sentence him in accordance with this term of the plea agreement, he did not wish to plead guilty. The trial court denied Brown’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

In its brief to this court, the State agrees with Brown’s contention that he should have been allowed to withdraw his guilty plea when the trial court failed to sentence him in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement. As this court stated in Bagley v. State, 681 So.2d 262 (Ala.Crim.App.1995):

“ ‘[T]he trial court is not bound to accept an agreement between the defense and the prosecution.’ Ex parte Yarber, 437 So.2d 1330, 1336 (Ala.1983). However, ‘ “[w]hen the trial judge decides not to carry out an agreement reached between the prosecutor and defense counsel, the accused must be afforded the opportunity to withdraw his or her guilty plea on motion promptly made.” ’ Bland v. State, 565 So.2d 1240, 1243 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), quoting Ex parte Otinger, 493 So.2d 1362, 1364 (Ala.1986).”

681 So.2d at 265 . See also Rule 14.3(c)(2)(iv), Ala.R.Crim.P. 1 Because the trial court, in effect, rejected the plea agreement in this case when it sentenced Brown to 25 years in prison, Brown should have been afforded the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea. Thus, the trial court erred in denying Brown’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. See Dalton v. State, 770 So.2d 650 (Ala.Crim.App.1999); and Moore v. State, 719 So.2d 269 (Ala.Crim.App.1998).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and this cause is remanded for the trial court to allow Brown the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McMILLAN, COBB, BASCHAB, and FRY, JJ., concur.

. Rule 14.3(c)(2)(iv) provides: “If the court rejects the plea agreement, the court shall ... [ajfford the defendant the opportunity to withdraw the defendant’s offer to plead guilty.”

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.