conforming written sentence to oral pronouncement by deleting provision for probation following incarceration
How later courts described this case
- conforming written sentence to oral pronouncement by deleting provision for probation following incarceration
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PER CURIAM.
We affirm an order denying Appellant’s motion to correct sentence, but remand as to count III in ease number 92-0311 for modification to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement. As to that count, the ten year successive probation is to be strick *449 en from the sentence, is not required. Appellant’s presence
STONE, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.