Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 624 So. 2d 405
  • 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9502
  • 1993 WL 372170
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Sep 24, 1993
Status
Published
On the bench
Altenbernd, Patterson, Ryder
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 59.8%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Laura Brown appeals her sentences imposed in case number 90-9615, contending the scoresheet contains numerous errors that, if corrected, would result in a lower permitted range. The state has conceded that there are errors in the scoresheet. Accordingly, we reverse Ms. Brown’s sentences in case number 90-9615, and remand for resentencing within the maximum range permitted by the guidelines, after recalculating the scoresheet. In this regard, the trial court should be guided by State v. Tito, 616 So.2d 39 (Fla.1993).

Ms. Brown also contends that the trial court impermissibly extended her probation in case numbers 90-9616, 90-9617, 90-9618, and 90-12265. We do not have jurisdiction to review this issue because Ms. Brown failed to appeal these cases. She may raise this issue in a motion for posteonviction relief.

Case number 90-9615 is reversed and remanded for resentencing.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.