holding that the doctrine of “ ‘relation back’ and other procedural rules designed to ‘heal’ violations of the statute of limitations cannot ‘heal’ violations of’ a nonclaim bar to recovery
How later courts described this case
- holding that the doctrine of “ ‘relation back’ and other procedural rules designed to ‘heal’ violations of the statute of limitations cannot ‘heal’ violations of’ a nonclaim bar to recovery
- holding that "relation back" and other procedural rules designed to heal violations of the statute of limitations cannot heal violations of the municipal notice-of-claim statute
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ALMON, Justice.
The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Hinkle v. Cargill, Inc., 613 So.2d 1216 (Ala.1992).
AFFIRMED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.