Opinion

Hardy v. Birmingham Board of Education

  • 601 So. 2d 98
  • 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 267
  • 1992 WL 126543
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Jun 12, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Russell
On the bench
Robertson, Russell, Thigpen
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.0%

The opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

RUSSELL, Judge.

The portion of this court’s prior judgment requiring that the Board continue paying the employee pending the outcome of the review panel’s hearing has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of May 15, 1992, 601 So.2d 93 , this cause is now affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for a judgment consistent with the supreme court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.