Opinion

Brown v. Singletary

  • 589 So. 2d 1016
  • 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11640
  • 1991 WL 245541
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Nov 20, 1991
Status
Published
On the bench
Frank, Lehan, Schoonover
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 71.8%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Brown appeals the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. After Brown was returned to custody in 1988 for violation of parole, all gain time accrued prior to his 1986 release from prison was forfeited. Brown sought without success to have the lost gain time restored pursuant to Rule 33-11.015, Florida Administrative Code. He then filed the petition that is the subject of this appeal.

The trial court found, and we agree, that restoration of gain time under the rule is a discretionary, rather than a ministerial, function. Accordingly, mandamus will not lie to compel performance. City of Miami Beach v. Mr. Samuel’s, Inc., 351 So.2d 719 (Fla.1977).

Additional arguments regarding the initial forfeiture of the gain time, presented to the trial court in a motion for rehearing, are without merit. Raske v. Martinez, 876 F.2d 1496 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 543 , 107 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989).

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.