Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 568 So. 2d 1002
  • 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8256
  • 1990 WL 162389
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Oct 26, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Danahy, Hall, Scheb
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case, including the finding that appellant is a habitual felony offender. § 775.084(3), Fla.Stat. (1989). We strike that provision of the judgment which requires the payment of court costs, without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice to appellant and the opportunity to be heard.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.