Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly 94
  • 524 So. 2d 1032
  • 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11705
  • 1987 WL 3183
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Dec 22, 1987
Status
Published
Author
Barfield
On the bench
Barfield, Nimmons, Shivers
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

Having reviewed each of the three issues raised by appellant, we find no error and affirm the judgment and sentence. In affirming we note that the appellant’s objections to the prosecutor’s comments made during closing argument did not include a basis asserted on appeal that the remarks were a comment on the appellant’s right to remain silent. An examination of the remarks shows that they were neither a comment on appellant’s silence nor the prosecutor’s personal assurance concerning the merits of the state’s case.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.