Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1916
  • 510 So. 2d 1150
  • 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9837
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Aug 7, 1987
Status
Published
On the bench
Joanos, Wigginton, Zehmer
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 63.2%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed on all grounds raised on appeal save one. His challenge to the legality of his sentence based on an error in scoring victim injury on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet may be properly raised by rule 3.800(a) motion. Because this motion should be so treated by the trial court, and because this asserted ground for relief is facially sufficient, denial of the motion on this ground is reversed and the cause remanded for consideration in accordance with Brown v. State, 508 So.2d 522 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED in part, and REVERSED in part.

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.