The opinion
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s probation was revoked for violating conditions (f), (h), and (k). Because no evidence was presented to prove a violation of conditions (f) and (k), we order the finding of a violation of those conditions stricken from the order revoking appellant’s probation. Otherwise, we affirm the order and the judgment and sentence.
SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.