Opinion

Brown v. Arkin Construction Co.

  • 216 So. 2d 434
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Dec 16, 1968
Status
Published
On the bench
Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thornal
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 14, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10 subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly the petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.