The opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of State v. City of Pensacola, Fla., 40 So.2d 569 ; Schmeller v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., 38 So.2d 36 ; State v. City of Clearwater, 124 Fla. 354 , 168 So. 546 ; State v. City of Coral Gables, Fla., 72 So.2d 48 ; State v. City of Jacksonville, 53 So.2d 306 ; and State v. City of Miami, Fla., 72 So.2d 655 . The case of North Shore Bank v. Town of Surfside, Fla., 72 So.2d 659 , is distinguishable in that it concerned an express legislative prohibition against the issuance of bonds in the manner there attempted.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, SE-BRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.