Opinion

Riddle v. Marshal of the District of Columbia

  • 1 D.C. 96
Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Nov 15, 1802
Status
Published
Author
Kilty
On the bench
Kilty
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Kilty, C. J.,

was for granting thé motion. Marshall, J., for discharging the rule, because there did not appear to be any means of quashing the justice’s execution. Cranch, J., for discharging the rule because the justice’s warrant did not appear to be regular; and if Riddle has been injured, he may bring his action. Rule discharged.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.